Blowing through the Jasmine
What is happening in the offshore wind market? Come to that what is happening in the onshore hurricane blowing round Westminster? And even after this market rally, arriving much as we expected last time, what should we still worry about? Valuations, recessions and inflation, all matter even if rate rises don't now.
A Feeling of Unreality in Westminster
One year in, Rishi looks incompetent and chaotically inconsistent. I simply can't explain Cameron's grinning re-emergence, it feels like a bad dream or worse joke. I hope he could never be selected again as an MP, after his murky financial dealings. The House of Lords is clearly less constrained. The arrogant indifference and heavy taint of sleaze can't be in the interest of voters.
There is a feel of an echo chamber inside Downing Street, of a puppet leader being strung along by unseen forces. Just last month the whole theme of the Party Conference was a fresh start, the last thirty years were apparently rubbish. Then we have this.
To the country and investors, it does not matter, although a half-awake opposition, or slew of oppositions, will be desirable in future; even if opposition politics is now easiest if you just wait for the other side to foul up and social media to rip them apart.
Zero-carbon? Can't Do it Yesterday?
A lot of notable recent shifts in the offshore wind sector, not surprisingly, as with so many zero carbon panaceas and the rush to do it all yesterday, the wheels are starting to come off. It is nothing like as cheap, or job creating, as the green zealots claimed or hoped. Protectionism is not helping either.
As Platts shows, for September, the more you make, the lower the price, just like real farming. UK offshore wind power is the least desirable in the entire European market.
Nothing wrong with the idea of offshore wind, and experts like SSE in the UK do well on big arrays in shallow waters, planned slowly, at least so far. Although even those are pricey and tend to need massive connecting grid structures.
Both Siemens and Orsted, to a degree newer entrants (at least compared to SSE), have taken a battering. Siemens had acquired a Spanish maker, but during the COVID fall out something came adrift, and it has hit big capacity and quality problems, resulting in billions in write offs ā now it is restructuring ā with a ā¬ 7BN subsidy from a group of banks. Heavy rotating machinery is always engineering hell; sticking it up a windy pole in salt water, is never that wise.
Orsted, the Danish developer, lopped 50% off its share price after ditching projects off Rhode Island and New Jersey - further billions written off. The idea you can put these things up off rocky coasts in areas of strong ocean currents and loads of shipping is quite interesting (and very New York, form over substance).
What torpedoed those projects was funding. The political desire for easy answers to high energy consumption made for poor outcomes (as ever), if everyone rushes to do it all at once, you simply create a cost bubble.
The single unit cost is never the same as for a thousand units; scaling up is always the tough part of any new technology.
Orsted share price - sourced from Yahoo finance - sharp focus on data
So, while Xi and Biden proclaim they will still save the planet, Biden rhetoric meets cost inflation once again, and cost inflation (and higher energy prices, a speciality of his) wins. Toss in protectionism, so that a Danish company is disqualified from his WTO busting subsidies, and the numbers no longer worked.
The Germans meanwhile find their own green funding trick ruled out by their own Constitutional Court, it involved taking a pre COVID funds surplus, and applying COVID emergency rules (on excessive deficit funding) and then spending it all post COVID. Isn't it odd that didn't really work? All three parts seem wrong.
Finally, the UK got no takers for this year's wind farm licences, as the guaranteed power price was too low. Next year the price has shot up, again guaranteeing higher energy prices for UK consumers (and industry) in the process.
Recession, Inflation and Valuations
Of the trio of recession, inflation and valuation, each investor has a particular fear. To me the nasty one remains inflation, and its friend rationing and stagnation. A lot simply can no longer be done. So that the modern solution (see above) of just throwing more money at it, from higher taxation and debt is largely pointless. Indeed, any farmer knows if you quadruple the inputs, it is still quite easy to halve the outputs.
We are deep into public service rationing now; we don't call it that, but persistent planned under delivery is rationing.
So, service sector inflation with declining 'outputs', is the issue. And that's the funny number 'outputs' we still record in GDP, so turning up, and being paid is an output, even if nothing (increasingly the case, both on turning up and doing anything) is actually done.
Recession? Well, I guess so, basic logic still says it must arrive some time; yet I still don't see big credit defaults or strain and a cooling labour market is clearly beneficial anyway.
And finally, valuations, well nearly everything looks cheap, outside big cap tech in the US, which somehow always feels pricey.
As rates fall through 2024, and funds flow out of cash and fixed interest, and M&A picks up, valuations still appear attractive. Albeit 2024 will (once more) be politically rather interesting.
Still, we could end up with some big questions answered and indeed big characters finally, finally, leaving the stage.
Maybe a summer breeze does lie ahead.
Charles Gillams
19-11-23
Lend me your fears
I come not to praise Kwasi, but to bury him. This is an explainable, predictable but probably futile coup in the UK Tory Party, along with more King Canute from Bailey of the Bank.
But in markets there is abundant good value, but with few clues on how, or at what cost, inflation is to be tamed. Or indeed what may escape this time.
Political Manoeuvres
We have long noticed the Tory partyās splits and factions, broadly between the left and the right wing. This was a chasm Boris was uniquely able to bridge, by talking right, and acting left. The puzzle, as we noted, was why the left would bring him down to replace him with a right talking right acting Prime Minister.Ā The preference was for a Blairite Conservative, low tax, high spending, but a steady reformer, with a lethal penchant for foreign wars and illogical hatred of the Euro. After Kwartengās departure, the Tories now have the doomed high tax big state faction back in charge again.
Hence the need for a pretext to overrule the party members and threaten Truss with the ever-gleaming sword of Damocles, held by the 1922 committee - we are back where the plotters wanted to be after Cameron ā with the neutral Hunt playing the safe stooge to hold the fort.
Unlikely to win the next election
It foretells the inevitable party split ā but we had never seen another Tory term as possible, regardless of the leader. Nor have we ever seen Keir Starmer as needing to do anything but sit tight and keep a grip on his party. If he is also spared the crippling cost of a really tight General Election, he can now face down the Trade Union money men as well.
As for Kwasi, if he stays the course, his troops will yet triumph at Philippi, he is by far the best the Tories have just now and looks to be the future. He has understood that if you fail to free the supply side, in a new productivity revolution, the current national decay will just go on, as it has for twenty years or more. But he has also not torched his future, Miliband style, in the wrong leadership move.
Will any of this stem the attacks by market traders? I doubt it. Will any of this forestall the inevitable sharp rise in interest rates, I doubt it. Or indeed stop ongoing sterling losses. To quell inflation requires interest rates above inflation, you canāt bear down from below. It remains daft to think UK interest rates can be effective whilst remaining underneath US ones either, as we said in our previous post.Ā
Both clipped from this site, and set out side by side. The core data as is cited below are from the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England respectively.
So, what is the shape of this next recession?
I think we are now starting to see it. Not that much unemployment, the current tight labour market, without addressing increased workforce participation, is going nowhere. Nor is a secondary residential property crash certain. That is so last century, both areas are now far more heavily fortified sectors than they were last time. And both are now designed (and legislated) to be fiercely inflexible downwards. That is what the current labour market (and our dire productivity performance) is telling us.
House prices are propped up by a very generous market backdrop, ongoing vice like planning, high land taxation, tons of liquidity and a deep political fear of the consequences of a collapse. For all the moaning, borrowers are still able to load up at negative real rates, with a highly competitive mortgage market and generous fixed term offers.
But do expect a general slaughter of small businesses (or rather the current collapse will go on despite the various support packages). Expect weak margins for UK based firms, ever more exposed to competition, from far more generous and protectionist states.Ā
WTO rules really are in tatters now and routinely ignored by powerful countries like the US and Germany. Expect a resulting fall in quality both in goods and services, again a continuation of current trends, as globalisation retreats.
But remember too, that so far, we do have inflation, but not a recession. The current dislocation is caused by a resource switch towards savers, who at all levels have had slim returns for a while, and we will now instead punish borrowers, who have had an absurdly easy, subsidised, inflationary decade.
The big picture, overall
Meanwhile in the energy world, a resource transfer is taking place from energy users to energy producers, who have likewise had a thin time of it. That those energy producers are places like the US, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Nigeria, Brazil, is a remarkable own goal for Europe.
But it is neutral for the world.
Indeed, much of those surplus funds will now be collected as various direct and indirect tax revenues, or to pay down debt, or as new investable funds, or distributed as dividend payments, but very little of that vast energy price transfer leaves the known universe.
For Europe, however the decline happens with the slow loss of productivity, plus the demographic torque. Meanwhile borrowing our way out, is suddenly becoming far more painful.
The political turmoil is ultimately from this change, and the longer states borrow more and pretend nothing has changed, the less effective will be their remedies. And indeed, the more the big efficient producers, like China, the US and Saudi Arabia will thrive. Neither more debt, nor protectionism will solve this, nor indeed will more global military adventurism.
Confidence is understandably damaged
Given that backdrop the mood music is damaged just now. Markets are trying to spark rallies, but with no real confidence yet.
Investors sense there is value, but with too little data to know where.
But whisper it quietly, Santa Claus is due, and the market mood is not quite as bleak as events suggest it should be.
Seeking an end to the turmoil
This market turmoil feels interminable, as asset markets stumble to find a firm footing and churn relentlessly. Instinct says thatās a time to buy. But there is so much happening, as this multi-year trauma unwinds, it is quite hard to know what.
Although we try to segment it, the key problem is the terrible dishonesty of politicians, who have bullied their citizens into an unthinking reliance on institutionalised theft on a grand scale and a belief that nothing really matters, as long as you have a press release to deflect it.
IT IS ALL STILL COVID
So, working through piles of annual accounts, as a pleasant distraction, (I have always enjoyed history), the one repeated theme, is of shrinkage, under investment, caution. This, in a way, is natural because COVID reset two years of global production, and indeed destroyed large areas of output and services. Which also makes it terribly hard to understand what ānormalā is now.
Not helped by the piteous vagaries of those craving spurious accuracy. Big banks and resource companies seem overall just to want to carry on shrinking, which is odd as their results seem very good. But they are not. All that has happened is they took big write offs and reserves in 2020 (which were not needed) and that then reversed in 2021. However, the underlying business volumes fell, the trend to more disposals than acquisitions was unremitting; these are shrinking businesses.
To the populists who believe higher taxation lowers inflation (are they mad?) and indeed, to market commentators, this looks good, but it is really not, productive employment is shrinking too, workforce participation is not roaring back.
And with inflation we will again see plenty of ātop line beatsā or rising revenue, but that too is an illusion. And indeed, raised dividends. For example, Shell now proudly offers a 4% dividend rise, as if that is generous; last decade it was, but not now.
That is now a real dividend cut.Ā
As we struggle with a badly damaged global economy, government policy is unremittingly wrong-headed: you wonder what we could do worse than the vast debt fuelled bubble after COVID?
But then we stumble on the idea of doubling or trebling domestic fuel prices. We do this to punish big energy exporters like Saudi Arabia and Russia. Only a simple clown could believe that will help us, and only a child-like vandal, that it will halt Russian armies. We take our own possessions out and smash them on the street, like voodoo dolls, because we are hurting and want others to hurt too. Nuts - it is tearing our own clothes in blind anger, but we ourselves are not the enemy.Ā
Meanwhile, underneath all this noise, is the game up?
Is the expansion we have seen for two decades based on cheap Asian product imports, and low interest rates fuelling inflation in non-traded goods now done? The non-traded category is everything that canāt be shipped in. Land, services and the like that must be consumed, where they are provided. Although with that went quite a lot of imported labour consumption too, of course.
I keep wanting to write positively on China, but I simply donāt know. Is their COVID winter politically sustainable? Is it a massive pivot back to a closed state? Was the aberration their great expansion, and they are now reverting to being a hermit kingdom? Instinct again says no, who would reverse the greatest success story of our time? But evidence the other way just slowly piles up. Another giant nation seems slowly to be sliding towards belligerent stagnation.
And so much went crazy with the toxic mix of low interest rates, and excess liquidity. We may at last have learnt that if you have a blocked pipe, spraying it with gold is not a remedy. The pipe stays blocked, but everyone gets flecks of gold on them. Better (and cheaper) to hire a plumber.
WHAT WILL BE THE THIRD POLICY ERROR?
We certainly donāt see the recent bubble implosion reversing, for all the bluster, crypto, and concept stocks, feel to us like a long term drag on the indices, remorsesly lower.
The turn feels to be more likely in bonds. The fight is between a shrinking set of outputs, but rising prices and apparently rising consumption. As long as policy blunders persist, and they show no sign of ending; then the upward pressure on rates will also persist.
But we doubt that any conceivable interest rate rise can solve this inflation. In short, the fire must burn itself out or at least no longer be stoked up.
In which case posturing about a long run 2% 3%, or 5% rate is really guesswork. But thatās the big question. If it is 3%, we are already there, but there is no great market conviction on that. At least the belated but long inevitable addition of the Europeans to rate rises, should take some heat off exchange rates.
LETTERS IāVE WRITTEN
What about Boris? I was quite surprised at the swift and co-ordinated move to a no confidence vote. The Tory party is rubbish at a lot, but plotting it does do rather well. And also surprised at the vote itself. The rebels can not win, without a candidate that both factions like, that is the real Tory party and this odd āCameron lightā lot in Downing Street. Of course, Boris himself is already largely that candidate, talks right, acts left. Which means all sides hate him, but neither can replace him, for fear of the āwrong typeā of fake instead. Just what you want to be, you will be in the end.
There was also a fair bit of bile, stirred up by the media, and rather infecting what are loosely called the āactivistsā, who are anything but, but do bend their MPās ears. They just want to dislike Boris and his lack of scruples, but also like the gifts he brings them.
They donāt want local trouble, so enough of those MPs voted against him, to keep their local associations happy. If that āterrible manā stays in office, they can at least claim they did their bit, but āothersā then let the side down. Ā Ā Ā Ā
Will Boris last up to the election?
Our core belief remains Boris stays in power long enough to hand over to Keir and Nicola. But perhaps we have rather less conviction than last week. We thought Keir was more likely to be in trouble, but perhaps the Tory plotters could be desperate enough to finally agree on a candidate? Either way this is now a lame duck UK government.
But then like markets, outside events may rescue it, itās just we really canāt see how at present.
As for where to consider investing? Our MonograM momentum model loves the dollar, for sterling investors and for USD ones, increasingly just cash, and decreasingly the S&P, so long the global refuge.
But that is in no way a recommendation, just an observation; more detail on our performance page.
He who pays the piper
A very strange quarter: the FTSE100 was up, in sterling terms the S&P 500 was up, and the Russian Rouble ended where it was just before the Russian invasion. Short term dollar interest rates are nicely positive at last.
So where is the problem?
UK policy changes ā could we finally be leading in economic policy?
Well, at long last the UK Chancellor has finally realised that just throwing money at inflation has one clear outcome: more inflation. This is tough lesson learnt back in the 1970ās and seemingly since forgotten.
If true it is a turning point and we predicted that it must always come sooner for the UK, if it persists in staying out of the Euro, than for bulkier continental currencies. Sunak also seems miraculously to be finally tackling some long overdue, multi-parliament, structural taxation issues, a rare sign of political maturity.
Whether he can hold the line against an increasingly dimwitted set of MPs and a media who constantly bay for more fuel to be added to the inflationary fire is unclear, but at least he has had the courage to step out into the unknown night, not cower by his warming bonfire of magic myths.
Nor is it clear whether he has the clout to unpick the cosy mess created by Theresa May and her childlike energy price fixing, or the ensuing nonsense from Ofgen. This fine-tuned capacity to the point of absurdity, guaranteeing a massive breakdown in the generating buffers, which had been painstakingly installed under a series of Labour governments.
Inflation policy is being taken seriously
But Rishi is trying; to cool inflation you simply must have demand destruction, there is no choice. This type of deep-seated widespread inflation will be hard to quell in any other way. True, areas of it can be contained, but it is hard to hold it all.
He is lucky to be helped by a Bank of England that seems to be serious about its brief, not regard it like Lagarde and Powell, as some kind of political inconvenience, to be wished away in double talk and evasion.
But heās unlucky in other ways; we noted a while back that China no longer seemed to care about headlong export led growth, or more broadly about access to hard currency. It feels it can invest with and gain from its own currency and avoid importing the monetary excesses of the West. That in turn means it cares less about the endless flows of cheap goods to Europe and the US, and conversely about soaking up those surpluses in luxury goods and services. None of this is good for our inflation.
Meanwhile by eliminating the oddly divergent starting points for the two income taxes, National Insurance and Income Tax, Sunak has opened the way to many benefits. It continues to drop taxpayers out of the system, despite desperate measures by HMRC to suck more in. A key step, and a sign of, for once, a more liberal, more efficient government. Many more steps are needed to unshackle wealth creation, but it is a start. It makes much of the Universal Credit complexity around thresholds also fall away. Most of all it is a step closer to combining the two income taxes.
Politically this is highly desirable, as it strips away the pretence of a low starting rate of taxes on income.
It perhaps even gives an excuse for the otherwise inexplicable step of introducing National Insurance on employees passed retirement age. Given so much of current inflation is due to the mass withdrawal of older workers, another step in that direction looks remarkably stupid, but perhaps it has a higher purpose. It is good to see that the āAmazonā tax as Business Rates should be called, as it gives Amazon such a massive earnings boost, is also clearly still under long term review.
Why has the rouble recovered?
Source : this page on tradingeconomics.
The recovery of the rouble is of course not a market step alone, doubling interest rates, exchange controls and the mass withdrawal of exports to Russia from the West, are part of the story too. But it also shows a turning point. At first the West was so shaken by Russian military attacks, it was prepared to follow its own scorched earth policy, regardless of the harm caused to our own people and employers.
But at some point, the realisation that Ukraineās army would hold, that Putinās army was not that good after all, especially up against modern weapons and we start to understand that the further blowing up of our own bridges just raised the ultimate bill. Here are the sanctions we've imposed.
So, it seems it is no longer true that any price is worth paying to help Ukraine or hinder Russia. Clearly, we donāt have to jettison all our principles in dealing with other tyrants, nor one hopes do we need to alienate every piece of remaining goodwill with the rest of the world, by panicked grandstanding.
The mob is still rampant, goaded by an American president for whom no European economic sacrifice is too great.
But maybe it is also time to tell Ukraine that no NATO also means no imminent EU: Brussels has its hands full with its own struggling ex-Soviet states. Ā Ā Ā Ā
And what about Powell and his policy?
Well, we donāt expect him to hold inflation down with his trivial rate rises, nor politically can he do more than tinker. It seems too that Lagarde at the very least has to get Macron back in, before telling the bitter truth about rates.
So, we feel the bond market has rates where the market would like them to be, in the US, not where they will be set by the Fed anytime soon. And the Euro is now in a very odd place, still with monetary stimulus being applied and with an unstable gap to US interest rates.
So, we may look to be where we were late last year, but in most cases the cracks are now alarmingly wide.
Europe, quite urgently, but the US as well needs a sharp jolt upwards in rates to halt inflation.
Oddly only the UK looks to have spotted the danger, stopped the false COVID āeconomic expansionā, tightened fiscal policy, reformed taxes and raised base rates steadily, towards where they need to be. How unusual.
Long may PartyGate continue if this is the end result.
We will take a break for Easter now, and resume on the 23rd.
If the first quarter is a guide, by then everything will have changed again.
DETONATION OR ROTATION
Two big market forces are at work just now, one is rotation out of the low interest rate winners, to wherever we go next, the other might be something more spectacular.
Enough of the market still sits in the ādonāt knowā category, to make everyone uneasy. The VIX is high.
So, what would cause the more explosive outcome? Traditionally higher rates divert more of the profits of indebted companies to banks and bondholders, so the theory goes, reducing dividends. Or at the more extreme level, this also makes refinancing debt harder.
This comes with a āsecond orderā impact, in that consumers or buyers also shovel more towards the banks, less towards the producers.
But none of this seems remotely likely yet, the world is awash with cash, and savings levels and interest rates have barely stirred from their COVID slumber.
Markets seem to be just talking about normalising, not slamming the brakes on.
Will we grow regardless of inflation?
The other big risk would be a failure of non-inflationary growth, which also seems unlikely. There are few practical signs of governments enacting the type of supply side restraint needed, we know. We still look for some self-restraint on how much governments seize in taxation; with high inflation taxes should be being cut, or thresholds systematically raised, but thatās also not happening.
The āidiot populaceā as curated by the media, constantly wants more supply side restrictions, greater consumption and lower prices, as if this was all somehow available; it is not. The worry here is that governments having messed up the big issues, give way to yet more populist demands for the impossible. At the same time, markets are also getting a little less keen to finance such nonsense or, being markets, raising the price at which they do so.
Well, all that is possibly true and has been happening for a while, but the old theory was that innovation was too fleet footed for any of that stuff to matter much. This is getting a bit tired, but broadly still seems to hold.
What if Ukraine does erupt?
So, the third detonator is in Vladās hands. Is a reverse Barbarossa coming down an autobahn near you? Well letās assume yes, because heās finally lost it. It is still fairly clear that if he steps onto NATO territory his army is in trouble, US and NATO airpower will rapidly outgun him. So, I discount that. But perhaps Ukraine does indeed end up like Belarus. China will support Putin, so the UN is irrelevant.Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā
Then what? Well, a nation the size of Spain gets locked out of European commerce. Not important. Defence spend goes up? Well, some would say āabout timeā. Germany can decide to burn coal or nuclear or freeze, see previous answer. Come to that, so can we.
Given Russian gas must go somewhere, a bit like Iranian oil, it probably goes to China, which then trades it or cuts back its own Far East imports. Gas as we all know, canāt be stored for any useful length of time. Russia needs the earnings from it, so it will emerge on the market somewhere, at pretty much the current price.
It will be messy, it will create hard choices, but Russia is well on its way to autarky already, it can certainly live without dollars. Is this really a detonator? On its own, I doubt it.
Where is the rotation?
So, we still conclude all this market reaction is rotation, and it is out of overpriced US equities, where Biden created the biggest inflation bubble by far, and where interest rates are rising faster than elsewhere in the OECD. Hence, we see the hazard as mainly still on Wall Street, and to a lesser degree to the US economy. Weāre looking at rising rates, a strong dollar, increased detachment from the global economy, and none of it helps earnings, but nothing is catastrophic either. The US (unlike the UK) wisely seized the chance to be energy independent.
But even so, we are not yet that concerned, valuations in the US are still extreme, as many sets of earnings seem to show, once the market looks at forward guidance, it shudders, and prices fall. A lot of built-in growth is needed to get price earnings ratios back down to earth, and thatās whatās being hit just now. To use a forty or fifty times earnings multiple, needs a lot of confidence about the future. That stretched temporal certainty is now lacking.
This is not that unusual for a rotation, but in that case, markets will bounce, and that will suddenly move a lot of funds off the side lines and back in. Where is that process now? Well going back to the Jan 27th low is causing some excitement. But we are not sure even thatās a disaster. Overall, the taking out of that and the October 2021 S&P low, wonāt be fun, but the market still had a heck of a run up last year.
Have a look at where our MonograM investment model allocates funds based on momentum, over the last three decades, the US is absent for significant stretches. We rebalance monthly, the next one will be most interesting.
And inevitably, we do feel cautious too, but it is about levels, not wipe outs. Rotation not detonation.
Charles A R Gillams
Monogram Capital Management Ltd