TEARS OF A CLOWN

An eventful week, the triumph of Trump and the debasement of Starmer, both heralding fiscal expansion based on higher borrowing; the market likes one, not so hot on the other. And how does all this extra spending emerge in the UK retail sector?

Reeves could have been crying about anything, but the optics looked terrible, in the familiar role of a Chancellor undermined by her own leader, for doing the right thing.

Even the IMF have noticed that policymaking via the OBR is bad news.

Like the previous Tory newbies, the big one term mass of Labour MPs has little party or national loyalty: theirs is a purely extractive stance, of what they and their constituents can loot from the Treasury.

Starmer was greeted as order after chaos, but is just a continuation of the mess. He is the clown, as the aptly named Miracles sang with Smokey Robinson just before 1968, his stance is “only there trying to fool the public.”

Fool me once
..

DO MARKETS CARE?

What do either mean for markets? Well equity markets like growth, real or artificial. To them whether wealth is being created, or borrowings are allowing the acceleration of consumption, matters little. So, both in the UK and US, that borrowings are rising far too fast, matters little for equities.

Bond markets are far less happy, but they are also still enjoying unusually high interest rates, at least by recent standards.

The whole package is being offset against a multi-year interest rate decline, as the COVID inflation peak slides further into history.

I have also always found a cheap currency is a nice extra cushion for any investor. Is the dollar cheap? Does it get cheaper? Possibly ‘yes’ to both. But why, is the more worrying question.

Although perhaps less puzzling, sterling strength is also odd. However, against the Euro it is looking sickly once again. It never recovered from Gordon Brown’s folly, although the Tory party was rebuilding it nicely up to Brexit
.

IS ALL LOST?

As for Reeves, all this fiscal laxity, she’s been splashing the cash for a year now, has to turn up in consumption and growth at some point, despite the high (but falling) savings rate.

“Household Saving Rate in the United Kingdom decreased to 10.90 percent in the first quarter of 2025 from 12 percent in the fourth quarter of 2024. Personal Savings in the United Kingdom averaged 7.77 percent from 1955 until 2025, reaching an all time high of 27.50 percent in the second quarter of 2020. source: Office for National Statistics”

Image and summary above in italics were clipped from this website

There is extra growth to be found there. I also sense the private sector, at least, is running pretty well now, adapting to change, cutting labour, de-gearing, putting the transient ill-effects of COVID well behind it.

So, the disaster is on the tax front, and the damage caused by out-of-control welfare spend.

The worry is that like the Tories before them, they are not remotely in control of those forces.

Will Reeves last? It is a heck of a sell signal if she does not. Will Starmer last? Not if he ditches her.

JUST WHEN YOU FELT SAFE

So, all is fine? No, not really, as those pesky tariffs are still largely unresolved and I sense in several cases, both sides still want a fight. Trump probably will take something, if he can sell it to the Rust Belt voter. But the assumption that he is always weak and seeking to cave, seems a tad dangerous.

I expect more chaos.

But a largely indifferent US market response.

GROUNDED

What is happening in the UK retail world?

I have been wading through some annual accounts. The big trends are the post COVID boom and the implications for space and shopping patterns. The race to online has not fully played out, but it certainly has slowed dramatically. Both M&S and J. Sainsbury claim to have done well in that time, the former seeing sales rise 50% overall, including a 75% jump in non-food, which looked to be in terminal decline at one point.

Although it still remains half the size of the stagnant Sainsbury.

Focused professional management has come in, driven from the top. A lot of the “nice to” stuff has gone, old-style full-service retailing is for the birds now.

Supply chains that felt knitted together randomly, are now boldly strategic, with far more automation. While store locations and numbers plunged, the estates were reconfigured. Balance sheets now look solid, dividends recommenced or stabilised.

The lease side has changed, the REITs for a long time had the whip hand, no longer. I have been looking at both British Land and NewRiver accounts. While some REITs just had their retail estates slaughtered by creditors, others like British Land, while moving away from the mega centres (even Meadowhall has gone) have doubled down on retail parks. Why? Yield it seems, dividends are stretched, NAV in offices just fades away and don’t ask about development profits.

In the end, do I believe in this surprising renaissance?

Not really, although some of the basket cases are now online, ASOS and Ocado, one-time market darlings, now have graphs that pay tribute to Disneyland, with fantastic towers, toppling to empty moats.

Retail is deserving of a lowly rating and still vulnerable, like all property, to an avaricious state.

MOVING ON

A final note, after five years in active fund management, I have moved on, disheartened by the terrible rigidity of the UK regulators’ rules, designed to rip off and confuse UK investors, which have so effectively destroyed the UK equity markets.

And it has to be said, rather attracted by the lure of momentum trading, less work, higher returns.

Running both together has been an excellent test bed.

 


Black Headed Bunting

Flags should be flying, the COVID cycle is over (says Lagarde) rates are falling, currency wars are afoot.

Ignore the noise, watch the graphs.

But somehow gloom pervades.

Truly a black topped bunting.

MIXED MARKETS

Markets are designed to confuse and a lot of that is happening, with the worst of recent gloom a way back now. In developed markets it was April, after which the value rally got going, very much with falling rates. And they are falling - seven cuts (or was it Trump’s nine?) in Europe. Less than a year ago rates were at 3.75% and are now almost halved to 2%. There’s a rising currency, giving an urgency to cut fast enough to stop the damage from competitive devaluations.

India also did a surprise double cut (so 0.5%) this week.

LatAm is behaving oddly, it has been a top market, year to date, but largely because it hit a low at the turn of the year; year on year it is not up. Brazil is almost in lockdown with rising rates (14.75%), and no surprise, a year-on-year market fall. Mexico is well into rate cutting, at 8.5% from a post COVID high of 11.25%. That market is up 17% this year.

Another year-on-year top performer is the Hang Seng, up 28%. Why is that?

Aubrey Capital kindly hosted an Emerging Markets conference in the City this week. A speaker noted that as China and Russia now avoid the USD, many traders are ending up with, or need access to, a non-convertible currency.

The PRC therefore apparently facilitates global gold exchanges, as a substitute, in three new offshore hubs (as well as Shanghai). This is perhaps helping to ramp the gold price.

From published Goldhub data

But that has physical limitations. However, China also has a convertible currency, in the Hong Kong Dollar.

If that gets used more, demand for it also rises.

The actual twelve-month top performer is the DAX in Germany, up 29%. But just across the Rhine, the CAC 40 has fallen over a year. If nothing else, easy terms like Emerging Markets, Developed Far East, LatAm and even Europe, are hiding some very mixed performances.

MISTS CLEARING

But the common theme does look like rate cuts, and that’s a cause for optimism. The UK now needs to be very careful that Labour’s fiscal ineptitude is not forcing rates to stay materially higher than in Europe, (still at 4.25%).  As a result, sterling is strong and in danger of getting stronger, helping inflation, but hurting growth. UK exporters are getting kicked enough already.

It hurts housebuilders too.

Compiled from the ECB’s recent publications

The UK market rally feels a lot about beaten up, high yielding stock, sensing some relief is inevitable, regardless of the Bank of England’s posture on inflation.

The strength in UK banks (a big part of that outperformance) is partly their attractive yields (as rates fall) but partly the belief that as rates stay high and weak demand persists, surplus capital allows them to buy back shares and reduce deposit rates, both of which the sector has been quite aggressive about. That’s nice, for banks, but it is a Goldilocks position, either rates now fall, or bad debts rise.

For all those caveats the Europe, Value and Emerging Markets rallies are real. And if rate cuts go on, we expect these to persist. Along with this, at some point, a currency reversal when the Federal Reserve finally moves.

Our work still does not suggest an outflow of funds from the US, just as it does not suggest a recession or pull back. None of which makes much sense, given the weaker dollar this year. Although it may simply show a reduced inflow rate into the US.

So, is something moving, that we can’t see?  Rising long rates are giving the same signal, of assets unexpectedly moving, out of fixed interest.

While I expect political chaos under Trump, amplified by an obsessed UK media, I do wish for some days of calm; could he not play more golf?

Some of us take no notice, of course.

OFFENSIVE FUNDING

Back in the UK, the defence review - a helpful two-page summary is available here; sounds like something for everyone. (If the Tory party had the intellectual depth to suggest this, both the profligacy and militarism would have raised Cain).  But it is all (as ever) fabrication, there are no available funds, even though the serious work of building inventory, finally starts.

We are promised six new energetics factories, which sounds like a modish protein bar, but just means lethal explosives. It is the logical move, but only accountants can deliver it. Year to year accounting means we must accept (and hope) that 80% of the energetic output will be made, stored, and then destroyed, at a vast annual cost. This stuff does not keep well.

I have yet to find a minister that can allow that annual profligacy. Creative accounting is needed.

I also can’t see how this hybrid Truss/Reeves can borrow (and tax) another 3% of GDP for defence. She has already rewritten the rules to add billions of spend, loaded the tax burden on companies, and now like Trump, wants to spend her way out of debt.

It simply won’t work.

KURD YOUR ENTHUSIASM

We noted last week (along with a speculation on tariffs, a mug’s game, I realise) how Turkey is surviving unconventional economics. It does sit in the Emerging Markets universe, and is owned in emerging EMEA funds.

Notably, while for some of those countries, the holdings are dominated by banks, for Turkey, it is all real manufacturing, distributing and retailing outfits that attract investment. The odd impact of high inflation.

Although much more tourism will put out more buntings, including those gracing the ruins at Kars.

 


WOLF IN SHEEPS CLOTHING - FRIEND OR FOE?

MORE ALL-TIME HIGHS

 

We have two types of bull market running, possibly both are fakes. But one is a belief in faster rate cuts to avoid a recession, the other is faster earnings to avoid rate cuts.

They are very different. Meanwhile Reeves is talking hard, but doing nothing, Kemi is doing a lot but keeping quiet. History tells us that the latter wins.

While markets near all-time highs make investors nervous. 

Basic Schematic of a way to look at markets – © Charles Gillams

 

In the US the release of animal spirits, the destruction of red tape, cutting of government jobs, firing of obstructive regulators, plus reasonable earnings, are juicing the indices. And independent growth forecasts are shifting up nicely from the Biden days. But that keeps interest rates punitively high. As do tariff tantrums.

But in the UK (and arguably in Europe) it is a relief rally in the face of slumping or stagnant growth. The resulting rapidly falling interest rates, caused the UK market to shoot up mid-week, on the dual promise of more rate cuts and a falling currency (making dollar earnings more valuable), as estimates of economic growth collapsed.

KEMI THE SILENT

What of Kemi? There are still plenty in the Tory Party who either resent her, or fail to see any future for her. At a London conference last weekend, the problem of too many politicians chasing too little work and money was very clear, but no one was accepting the blame for their diminished position.

They have lived too long on the coat tails of Westminster to understand how long the path to redemption is. For that group, the resurgence of Reform is especially bitter. There had been a sudden burst of hope last year, as the victorious Labour hordes were found to have feet of clay. That hope is dissipating.

However, there was some great information on London polling, high quality, in depth, but the stage was so full of defeated (and ill disciplined) politicians, the real data got half shown, ignored  and shunted into the rush for lunch.

WHO CARES ABOUT BIG BAD NIGEL?

As Kemi knows well, she won’t be fighting anyone for four years, and when she fights, the ground campaign matters. She was in no rush to select candidates, noting no need for social gadflies, if when free school meals needed cutting, they wimped out.

Cleverley was sounding realistic too, in London the ground game needs to be there, to attract a good general. Just asking good generals (like him), if they wanted to run, with no money raised, was getting the process back to front.

And what a shambles London Tory politics is. The London Assembly is a joke, the last two Mayoral candidates came from its ranks, indeed were on stage, but were bafflingly poor. If the LA has a purpose, it is holding the Mayor, to account, but as he is directly elected, they have no weapons, (much as they seek more, see this report). They just fill endless posts and talk in an echo chamber. The power remains in the London Boroughs and the political associations that match them, who pick the MPs.

It a system almost designed to be vacuous and needs a rethink, as does the structure of opposition to it.

CCHQ staff numbers have collapsed, 75% have gone, the money spent on a lost election will cripple the party for years. Donors are heading for the hills, after watching Sunak burn their cheques. While associations are being told to merge, sell their drinking clubs, agree confederations, to allow a few paid staff, a recipe that was singularly unappealing in the hall.

ANY STRATEGY?

The big issues for 2029 look to be Net Zero and the Euro. Which matter little to most people, but they are the fault lines. Reform is clear on both. Nothing concerns younger Tory members as much as Net Zero, nothing concerns older ones as much as the EU.

Rather than worry about “uniting the right” it may be far more important strategically to split the left. Already half of Labour is happy to send us back to the Stone Age if Net Zero requires it, half can already see it creates inflation and destroys union jobs. In both major parties, there is a love of Brussels, as a gentle, civilised place, but in both a visceral hatred of the Euro.

So yet again, attack the fault, are Remainers serious about the Euro? If not, they are like the Scots Nats at the Independence Referendum, when challenged on keeping sterling – they had no answer, no credibility.

As for Reform, it is upset over deferred County elections, but should not be. A strong showing would generate funds, keep momentum building, but that was not on offer. They have no ground game, candidates have been parachuted in, associations cobbled together; far better to wait. They will have time, will (if real) pick up by-election seats and likely do better next year.

Importantly, every seat in the new unitary authorities will lack a true incumbent: in local elections incumbency counts. The old parties will be split by the bitter infighting between too many councillors for too few seats. And while they may not care, two tier councils are as bad as two tier policing, and should go.

If Kemi needs to care about Reform, it can wait. Insurgent parties frequently split and media attacks will follow. Rather than be fearful of the noise they create, she can wait to see if any of it has substance.

She can rely on getting her votes out, cutting defections, having clear policies, on message candidates, and rebuilt coffers. If that is achieved, she clears the stay at home ‘sofa voters’ and has a fighting chance.

Everyone knows that another leadership change before the next election will likely be fatal.

And if in London, do catch the King’s Gallery show of Renaissance Drawings, till 9th March, as others have noted, only the Uffizi can rival this collection. Casually shown, little publicised, but full of gems.

 


PHOTOGRAPH OF A BOAT CALLED RECOVERY ON THE RIVER THAMES, IN FRONT OF BIG BEN WHICH IS UNDER SCAFFOLD

AGAINST THE TIDE

The two massive current market questions are about liquidity and rates: maybe that’s just one question.

So, do we now question our long-held assumptions?

The storm in a teacup in a short trading week over UK Gilts is of little interest, we all know where it leads, I am sorry to say.

STILL ENOUGH LIQUIDITY?

Liquidity is the scary issue, and bond yields rising indicates a loss of liquidity, but is it serious?

I don’t think so; the usual sequence is a panic causes a loss of liquidity, so settlement starts to fail, causing technical defaults, and then the frightened regulators crash the system. None of that is visible.

There are real strains, no doubt, Russia is struggling to finance war, China is suffering a property bust, but notably rates there are falling. Saudi Arabia can’t fund expansion on less than 90$ oil, and both France and the wider EU are in very deep. But none of that is causing disastrous rate rises. Indeed, currencies, as intended, are taking some of the strain.

Gold and bitcoin are building vast, useless, liquid supplies of wealth. While a strong tech market is luring funds away from bonds, and of course the US Federal debt is vast.

Nor does anyone want to be in the market, when the inevitable happens, liquidity crises are a persistent feature of the system.

But for all that I see Central Banks still holding the line reasonably well. No one state has seen a dramatic failure, even the UK, always the weakest, is not yet really offering an enticing rate on ten-year money, given its failure to stop inflation.

So, the current liquidity action still looks, on balance, like bets for and against rate cuts, not distress.

And Trump has profoundly disrupted global markets, by offering a genuine, large-scale alternative to secular decline.

BACK TO RATE CUTS

What about rate cuts then? And inflation.

Inflation is clearly a problem, Biden has been running the US economy hot, to try to win the election, and now Trump optimism is doing the same.

US NON FARM PAYROLL - DECEMBER 2024

A GRAPH OF THE USA PAYROLL - NON FARM EMPLOYEES

From this website

 

 

And the Fed rate cuts now look ahead of the curve. Indeed, the pre-election 50-basis point one always was.

We felt it was politically motivated, so a sharp kick through a reversal and a rate rise is indeed possible, but with real US rates still positive, it would also feel gratuitous.

The rest of the world has the opposite problem. True it will now import US dollar inflation, especially on energy, and its exports pre-tariffs will look more competitive, but I doubt if either matters, when austerity looms once more.

They just serve to disguise the underlying issues. Although it is possible Germany gets a Trumpian boost, post-election.

However, it will still be really hard for the European old guard to resist rate cuts, let alone allow rate rises. Taking down an already non-functioning banking system, would be reckless.

The UK is very vulnerable; that’s why avoiding the Euro made so little sense, if we were set on swallowing the other nonsense.

I have never seen other outcomes, given Labour election promises and the need for some attempt to steady the ship before implementing real reforms. But nor have I ever seen other exits bar Truss II. If Reeves and her team let up on real service cuts, they have signed their own resignations. Spending money and raising taxes is instant, so never the hard part. Cutting bloated budgets is also easy, but does need nerve, time and skill. The jury is still out on if Labour has those.

WINTER BLUES

All the market turbulence relates to the holiday period, which in the US now spills over into late January with Martin Luther King Day, and the added impact of various Presidential comings and goings, so I think it can still be ignored.

Thin trading encourages stunts. While Q1 data is usually terrible, the most adjusted season of the year.

The first “live” Fed meeting therefore looks to be on March 19th. Which is well after earnings season.

So yes, volatility and reasons to be fearful, but overall, I fail to see this derails the Trump boom. Also, at some point the UK mood will change, if only for shares with high dollar earnings.

Adequate liquidity and on-going rate cuts therefore remain supportive narratives, but both are currently on a winter break.

Assuming no disasters on their return, the year ahead looks fine.

OTHER PLACES

India

I have had a longer look at the Indian economy.

In aggregate  India remains impressive, with plenty of money being made and invested. However, it can in the end go no faster than the average voter, and for some of those, life remains tough.

Modernisation and urbanisation look great on the IMF charts, but always come with a cost, in particular for the urban poor. To be clear, there is no old-style deprivation, no lack of food or clean water, no loss of civil order, there is some basic healthcare, but for all that a lot of surplus marginal labour still. Navigating those strains, while building a modern state, is no small feat. So, India looks great, but only if it can hold a basic policy line through and beyond the retirement of Narendra Modi. Here is a summary of India’s 2025 issues, as taught to its civil servants.

Pakistan, Argentina, Poland, Hungary

Of the true frontier markets, which is the tier below emerging, the best Asian performer last year was Pakistan at +83%, but even they failed to match Argentina at + 91%. While closer to home the expected ending of the disaster that is the Ukraine War, let Poland achieve +46% and Hungary +36%.

None of these have much depth, all feel like recoveries from oversold positions.

Yet at some point Europe needs a single functioning capital market, not a string of small historic ones. Within that, the great advantages of New Europe, low state debt, plentiful land, skilled labour and big EU spend, could be attractive in the multi-year boom that will follow the end of hostilities.

 

 


Outside the Museum of Modern Art – Massachusetts – Photograph by Charles Gillams

OFF BALANCE

Trump’s win with a clean sweep was a surprise, and one that recalibrates the investing world. Most UK media, right or left expects we want to hear ongoing condemnation of Trump and by extension Republican policies; not me, I think those policies pull the world back from the brink.

Why was I surprised? The market and polls (at least the serious ones), had him winning, but not the media. On election night CNN, which was otherwise brilliantly forensic, seemed upset at the New York Times calling it for the Republicans, quite late on in the process; facing reality had somehow become betrayal. Only ITV, to my mild surprise, was in the real world, giving us the facts, like old style journalism, first.

Just history? Not quite, because the investment media is still making the same mistake. Affluent Harris supporters are lining up, not to deny the result, but to concoct fantastic negatives.  The resulting general doom is leaking into markets, blaming unenacted Trump policies (and indeed they are un-enactable for two more months) for rates hardening and a change of future Federal Reserve policies!

Nonsense, I would have said.  The Federal Reserve will keep behaving as it has, all along - data dependent, rear view mirror stuff.

BRAVE NEW WORLD

So, what does change? Fundamentally it breaks the pack, the investable world was largely of one, foolish mind, that COVID, Ukraine, Climate Change and De-globalisation could all be funded, free, by simply raising debt and tax. There was an assumption of no impact on growth or competitiveness or consumption.

At last, we have the dominant global market saying otherwise. Now the ESG fanatics, armchair war mongers and de-globalisation crowd, must think again; they must pick their fights.

The world has long grown weary of American wars, fought on non-American soil. The idea given everything else, of the mighty EU military (yes, that one), stepping in, is risible.

Maybe we get no immediate peace, but the noise volume (and casualty toll) will drop sharply. A small mercy.

TRADING BLOWS

That Trump is full on for de-globalisation, is remarkably stupid.  And so is China believing it can swamp the world in subsidised over-production for ever. Since it is unlikely that despite various efforts the WTO can be fixed anytime soon, this will continue to be a sporadic issue.

The long run trend to price American workers out of global markets will continue, which given America’s other advantages, is a relief for the rest of the world. But I also doubt if much of what China has produced becomes truly uncompetitive, even with a 60% tariff.

We can look forward to more spats, tariffs on rye whisky and smoked salmon - that kind of thing. Locally damaging, but I doubt if in the end it does much.

Meanwhile the big Biden era protectionist schemes, his beloved IRA and the cute but pricey CHIPS Act, both loathed in Europe, will be sensibly reined in, taking a fair bit of the heat out of trade matters.

MORNING IN AMERICA

Nor despite the panic over RFK Jr., do I have unusual fears for the pharma industry, about the most regulated  sector on the planet, already facing long term persistent attacks on high margins for new drugs. This certainly needs fixing. But I am somewhat doubtful that the Senate will confirm RFK Jr.

From an investor point of view, less anti-trust activity looks a win, assuming Khan goes. While I can see anti-monopoly action against the Tech giants rumbling on, Trump is not a fan of them in general, I now don’t see break-ups as likely.

And some of the ridiculous barriers to the extractive industries will come down, that have encouraged Americans to source raw materials from far less regulated and more polluting places, which can only be positive.

LABOUR MARKETS

What of the labour market? Here too deregulation will release a lot of direct jobs, by allowing business to produce more efficiently, and can be expected to release excess regulators (is there another kind?) onto the market too.

I can’t see real migrant deportations, outside those with criminal convictions, rising much, and there will always be Democrat States undermining the effort, even if attempted. The place to control illegal migration, is always at the border, or close by. Biden let migration soar to four million over his term, against Trump’s one million.

If Trump can get back to that lower level, given the pressures, he will have done well.

Deregulation and AI will improve labour use, but labour shortfalls from lower migration will cut supply, so the outcome is not clear, either way. But the migrants are not generally taking skilled professional jobs on arrival, which is where current wage inflation is.

PAIN IN THE WALLET

What of taxation? Trump will be very keen to keep those tax cut promises. I think some cuts can be funded, and in the end, Congress will want those too, before the midterms.

But full on, deficit exploding? Not likely.

We still don’t have Trump’s main economic picks. The Fed Chair will retire, on schedule (not early), to great applause, despite the noise to the contrary. I doubt if his replacement comes from outside the current Federal Reserve Board. A left field choice could upset markets, which Trump has been reluctant to do.

In summary although there is still a bias against Trump’s America, in fashionable media and on the investment sales teams, I think it is like their views on the election itself, largely reflected noise.

The world they would like, not the world that is. There is a lot of discussion on why this happened of course.

And whatever pose they strike for the media, fund managers, at the core, know low tax, with economic growth, is balanced. The opposite, high tax and no growth is not. Long term returns flow from that.

That will be good for the global economy too.

 

 


Sign up to ourmonthly insight

A different spin on the movements and meanderings of the market from CIO Charles Gillams.

Sign up
LinkedInSchedule a Call

Important Notice

Monogram Capital Management Limited does not make investment recommendations, and no communication through this website or otherwise should be construed as a recommendation of any security. This information is intended only for Professional Investors as defined under the rules of the Financial Conduct Authority and is not directed at Retail Clients. If you are not sure which you are, please take advice from your Wealth Manager or Independent Financial Adviser.

The contents of this page are intended as an information service. They are not recommendations and should not be used as a basis for investment. Information gathered directly or indirectly from this page is based on sources that Monogram Capital Management Limited and its personnel deem reliable but Monogram Capital Management Limited can under no circumstances be answerable for the totality or correctness of the information.

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and you may not get back the full amount originally invested. Your capital may be at risk.

Privacy Preference Center