Into Broad, Sunlit Uplands?
This week has included a major but baffling fixed interest event in London. And we include some thoughts on the novelty of a conservative prime minister for the Conservative party - but first, the shape of the coming recession.
Who Survives in the Coming Recession?
It may help to see this recession, as just the reversal of the COVID boom, paid for with debt and deeply inflationary; in which case what should it look like? The ultimate aim will be to unlock labour markets, where we said (in our newsletter of 20-3-21) that COVID would do most harm.
Unlike traded goods or commodities or liquid assets, there is no simple snap back available without pain, because labour pricing is inflexible downwards. Indeed organised labour has worked hard to embed that inflexibility, notably in minimum wage laws, and the crippling of the hated gig economy.
Certain capital assets too are stranded and inflexible, but probably not most commercial (or residential) rents. Large single purpose buildings may be vulnerable and we feel, so is quite a lot of owner occupied residential property, whereby recent unearned gains will now need reversing.
Labour costs have two available paths. Either the 40% of working age adults who have now withdrawn from the labour market must (in some measure) return. It is their ongoing withdrawal post COVID that has hurt most. While COVID has also created (mainly in the public sector) a lot of extra staffing that is hard to step back from, especially in healthcare, which further depletes the available labour pool, and must also be reversed. Reducing labour taxes also helps.
Possible business failures
If not, there may instead need to be widespread private sector business failures. The third option, a speeding up of capital investment to substitute for labour, has somehow failed to be either fast enough or effective enough. It seems just too hard for businesses to predict demand paths, to commit to such expenditure. Cap ex is all about confidence, which is absent.
How then to measure if this labour reset finally happens? Well it looks as if job creation will need to go into reverse, with a net two quarters (at least) of contraction. There are plenty of businesses to fail, speculative and derivative loss making tech for a start, retailers of goods who over extended in the supply chain inspired boom, service sector spaces, where the current surge has drawn in capacity well in excess of long run demand, will all get hit.
As will everyday businesses, that have net margins that canât withstand the double figure interest rates demanded of sub prime (i.e. now most SME) borrowers.
Paint that template over where the most savage equity falls have already happened, it fits quite well. But it is by no means universal, if IP, not labour matters, or labour can be off-shored, it is in a better place.
Although as jobs disappear, so the strain reaches further into total consumption and demand.
Fixed or Floating.
What of fixed income? Well we took the view early this year that you canât stand in the way of an avalanche, unless you hope to surf it. So we kept clear, and still are.
Source : this page
It was a very well attended fixed income conference in London this week, so credit is clearly back into portfolios, big time. My worry was the Table Mountain (or Brecon Beacons or Grand Canyon) graphs. All of which were steep sided, but flat topped, and on all of which, just now, is the exact point when lungs bursting, you climb the last butte, to see a vast sunlight upland.
Really? Why? No idea, but somehow the collective belief is rates top out circa 4% and then fall.
Certainly not if they mirror the inflation path (see above), that gap is now vast twixt interest rates and inflation; it will close - it has to. However we see more rises, not a near term peak and also far slower falls, than the market does. Reason? It is labour inflation that now drives it, and it wonât roll over soon.
Unless that is, the rate rises so far have done real damage and rates are then cut to mitigate a severe recession. If thatâs the expectation (and it may be) you really donât want equities at all, not even energy, the yearâs bright spot.
So the question is, are high yield bonds now cheap?
Well yes, and quite attractive; defaults at the rate now implied, are unheard of. But if that odd plateau graph of rates is wrong, everything has yet to get even cheaper. Thatâs the rub. And that is why, for now, bar floating rate, secured, we are still not going into credit. And also because global interest rates must eventually align, so the dollarâs ongoing strength is a bad sign, as that will have to reverse too. This makes dollar assets themselves now dangerous.
The same dilemma is true for equities, yes, high quality, mid-size companies look cheap, the FTSE 250 is down some 20% in a year, almost as bad as the NASDAQ, whereas the FTSE 100 is modestly up (a distinction shared only with the Nifty 50). But again, we thought that value was emerging in the summer, but sadly not so; the market still sees a viscous earnings contraction ahead.
Which brings us back to employment, either it must fall, or participation must rise, and I fear we expect a fall, which seems more likely. This cycle, in the all important labour markets, still feels a long way from done.
New Broom
As for Truss, well talk of growth at the inept and hidebound Treasury is a nice change. As is that of getting the country working (spot on). This is core free market stuff. Has she the votes? Pretty sure she has, it was odd for the left wing of the party to eject Boris, who his actions showed was one of theirs. To unseat another leader would guarantee oblivion, so they must back her.
Worrying about fiscal rectitude, for a two year government, seems oddly implausible too. Yet she still fell prey to the old belief that governments (and higher tax) solve everything with her energy package, least of all can that solve demand based inflation. That is for Central Banks to do, and as ever, they are getting no help from the rest of government.
Does this suggest a big US rate hike this week? Not sure, we are much more seeing the end point as rather higher, than faster near term rises. We kind of think the Fed has made their point already.
Investment, Politics and Economic cycles
An intriguing current question is which cycle are we in now? Is it the 2000 to 2022 one, or the 2008 to 2022 version? We look at the arguments, and the politics behind it all. And who exactly are energy sanctions designed to hurt?
Hopefully, everyone has now understood it is not the 2020 + rate cycle. Why should it matter? Well, the implications for interest rates are startling. And indeed, for buying on the dip.
Interest rate cycles
If you consider that interest rates should be about 2% above inflation, to induce savers to defer their consumption, then this cycle really extends from 2000 onwards. The excess credit of that era, led firstly to the GFC in 2008. This in turn led to sudden a lack of credit, but ultimately exactly the same problem of excess debt has reappeared in 2022. The efforts to dampen cycles, seem to just exaggerate them. As does using the same remedy for two very different problems.
Hereâs the US picture from the late 1990âs to 2017
In a similar way UK Base Rates in January 2000 were 5.5%, as they were in December 2007, before a long descent to 0.25% in August 2016 which largely held (with a few bumps) all the way to December 2021, when they were still 0.25%! That was before the recent rather modest rises. So, by our âinflation plus 2%â measure of sanity, October 2008 was the last time base rates were sensible.
Ref: this stats article
In other words, this crisis was foretold. SPACs were an early indicator which we mentioned back in 2020. So, if the GFC was caused by too much credit in the US sub-prime housing market, will the hallmark of this one be excess speculation in meme stocks and crypto currency? Clearly, we have now learnt that these âassetsâ are all distinctly well correlated with each other.
In which case, banking regulation was only half the answer to these vicious moves, because the regulatory perimeter is always too tight. The vandals will inevitably camp just outside the walls - wherever they are built.
Will inflation auto-correct?
It also raises the question of whether the âcureâ to moderate this economic cycle is going to be a continuation of the same lax monetary policy. A rather fuzzy consensus has formed around the 3.5% level for interest rates to top out, falling back down in time.
We accept that is roughly the market belief, but feel it needs big assumptions about the auto-correction of inflation, which is presently just a fervent hope. In the real world (as distinct from asset bubbles) interest rates are too still low to matter, and we still have negative real rates on an exceptional scale. If Central Banks are really hoping to correct the laxity of 2007 to 2022, they will not stop at the current levels, but will go far beyond and cause a proper recession. But if they just want to re-establish the post 2008 consensus, they will go easy. They are talking about the former, acting like the latter with all their foot dragging and funny fixes. Is Euro fragmentation sorted? We doubt it. But if it is, they are not telling us, or really even defining what it is.
The ECB and our energy pricing policies
That partly is why markets are jittery, and why the ECB seeming to move from the cheap money forever camp (leaving Japan all alone there) to the appearance of being serious about inflation was so traumatic. We still donât think they will tame inflation with interest rates alone, as by definition to do so breaks the Euro. This is because Italian debt in particular canât be funded at any credible real interest rate. So, they too are just hoping for the best.
We also remain baffled by the Westâs energy pricing policy that has created this sudden existential crisis. It was interesting to hear Boris telling a startled world, from Kigali, that not everyone feels creating a global food crisis is a rational approach to the Ukraine invasion. As if that was news, although it clearly was to him.
The politics behind it all
But there too we sense two underlying agendas.
Just as it is possible these interest rate rises are really to mop up the GFC policy errors, so also, a large part of the left is desperate for high energy prices. This includes the more thoughtful contingent hoping demand destruction will help sustainability goals (we ourselves have long advocated ÂŁ2 per litre petrol, but gradually building to that over the last decade, not overnight), but also the more zealous, who are keen to exploit the crisis to render renewables competitive, that much sooner.
There are some big distortions  in energy prices too, much of it created by the modern obsession with competition at all costs.
If this is so, then Russia is just a convenient excuse to ramp up carbon prices, blaming Putin for the resulting misery and achieving long-term goals. Certainly, Biden is acting that way, albeit, as ever talking the opposite way. Or rather his clever minders are.
There is a hint too that Boris is in the same deranged camp.
Oddly the EU led by Germany and Austria, with talk of restarting coal plants seem a little more pragmatic. Meanwhile the great beneficiary is Russia and the ever-stronger Rouble. They too have used the crisis to consolidate long term aims, not just in the war-torn rubble of Ukraine.
In short you either have inflation, or a credible short term means to create energy to replace Russian supplies, or high interest rates.
It is odd to think you would want to select just the first and last of that trioâŠ.unless your motivation was to correct another perceived policy error.
Seeking an end to the turmoil
This market turmoil feels interminable, as asset markets stumble to find a firm footing and churn relentlessly. Instinct says thatâs a time to buy. But there is so much happening, as this multi-year trauma unwinds, it is quite hard to know what.
Although we try to segment it, the key problem is the terrible dishonesty of politicians, who have bullied their citizens into an unthinking reliance on institutionalised theft on a grand scale and a belief that nothing really matters, as long as you have a press release to deflect it.
IT IS ALL STILL COVID
So, working through piles of annual accounts, as a pleasant distraction, (I have always enjoyed history), the one repeated theme, is of shrinkage, under investment, caution. This, in a way, is natural because COVID reset two years of global production, and indeed destroyed large areas of output and services. Which also makes it terribly hard to understand what ânormalâ is now.
Not helped by the piteous vagaries of those craving spurious accuracy. Big banks and resource companies seem overall just to want to carry on shrinking, which is odd as their results seem very good. But they are not. All that has happened is they took big write offs and reserves in 2020 (which were not needed) and that then reversed in 2021. However, the underlying business volumes fell, the trend to more disposals than acquisitions was unremitting; these are shrinking businesses.
To the populists who believe higher taxation lowers inflation (are they mad?) and indeed, to market commentators, this looks good, but it is really not, productive employment is shrinking too, workforce participation is not roaring back.
And with inflation we will again see plenty of âtop line beatsâ or rising revenue, but that too is an illusion. And indeed, raised dividends. For example, Shell now proudly offers a 4% dividend rise, as if that is generous; last decade it was, but not now.
That is now a real dividend cut.Â
As we struggle with a badly damaged global economy, government policy is unremittingly wrong-headed: you wonder what we could do worse than the vast debt fuelled bubble after COVID?
But then we stumble on the idea of doubling or trebling domestic fuel prices. We do this to punish big energy exporters like Saudi Arabia and Russia. Only a simple clown could believe that will help us, and only a child-like vandal, that it will halt Russian armies. We take our own possessions out and smash them on the street, like voodoo dolls, because we are hurting and want others to hurt too. Nuts - it is tearing our own clothes in blind anger, but we ourselves are not the enemy.Â
Meanwhile, underneath all this noise, is the game up?
Is the expansion we have seen for two decades based on cheap Asian product imports, and low interest rates fuelling inflation in non-traded goods now done? The non-traded category is everything that canât be shipped in. Land, services and the like that must be consumed, where they are provided. Although with that went quite a lot of imported labour consumption too, of course.
I keep wanting to write positively on China, but I simply donât know. Is their COVID winter politically sustainable? Is it a massive pivot back to a closed state? Was the aberration their great expansion, and they are now reverting to being a hermit kingdom? Instinct again says no, who would reverse the greatest success story of our time? But evidence the other way just slowly piles up. Another giant nation seems slowly to be sliding towards belligerent stagnation.
And so much went crazy with the toxic mix of low interest rates, and excess liquidity. We may at last have learnt that if you have a blocked pipe, spraying it with gold is not a remedy. The pipe stays blocked, but everyone gets flecks of gold on them. Better (and cheaper) to hire a plumber.
WHAT WILL BE THE THIRD POLICY ERROR?
We certainly donât see the recent bubble implosion reversing, for all the bluster, crypto, and concept stocks, feel to us like a long term drag on the indices, remorsesly lower.
The turn feels to be more likely in bonds. The fight is between a shrinking set of outputs, but rising prices and apparently rising consumption. As long as policy blunders persist, and they show no sign of ending; then the upward pressure on rates will also persist.
But we doubt that any conceivable interest rate rise can solve this inflation. In short, the fire must burn itself out or at least no longer be stoked up.
In which case posturing about a long run 2% 3%, or 5% rate is really guesswork. But thatâs the big question. If it is 3%, we are already there, but there is no great market conviction on that. At least the belated but long inevitable addition of the Europeans to rate rises, should take some heat off exchange rates.
LETTERS IâVE WRITTEN
What about Boris? I was quite surprised at the swift and co-ordinated move to a no confidence vote. The Tory party is rubbish at a lot, but plotting it does do rather well. And also surprised at the vote itself. The rebels can not win, without a candidate that both factions like, that is the real Tory party and this odd âCameron lightâ lot in Downing Street. Of course, Boris himself is already largely that candidate, talks right, acts left. Which means all sides hate him, but neither can replace him, for fear of the âwrong typeâ of fake instead. Just what you want to be, you will be in the end.
There was also a fair bit of bile, stirred up by the media, and rather infecting what are loosely called the âactivistsâ, who are anything but, but do bend their MPâs ears. They just want to dislike Boris and his lack of scruples, but also like the gifts he brings them.
They donât want local trouble, so enough of those MPs voted against him, to keep their local associations happy. If that âterrible manâ stays in office, they can at least claim they did their bit, but âothersâ then let the side down. Â Â Â Â
Will Boris last up to the election?
Our core belief remains Boris stays in power long enough to hand over to Keir and Nicola. But perhaps we have rather less conviction than last week. We thought Keir was more likely to be in trouble, but perhaps the Tory plotters could be desperate enough to finally agree on a candidate? Either way this is now a lame duck UK government.
But then like markets, outside events may rescue it, itâs just we really canât see how at present.
As for where to consider investing? Our MonograM momentum model loves the dollar, for sterling investors and for USD ones, increasingly just cash, and decreasingly the S&P, so long the global refuge.
But that is in no way a recommendation, just an observation; more detail on our performance page.
Hard Landings?
Local elections tell us remarkably little about national ones. We reflect on those. Meanwhile US equity markets are in turmoil, and some big numbers are changing very fast - some further musings.
Do English local elections count ?
We start with the UK, or rather English local elections, the devolved governments (oddly) have a rather greater read through from local to national. But overall, nothing in the results changed our view that Boris will probably survive, unless the Tory party unites around an alternative, which is pretty near impossible: it has too many splits.
Nor has our long-standing opinion that all Keir needs to do is keep his head down and he will be the next Prime Minister changed. Although if Labour starts to believe it is a shoo in, and can pick who it likes as leader, it will also self-destruct. Which is just about the only chance the Liberal Democrats have of being relevant.
Just how politically marginal local elections are, is shown by the surge of support for the Greens, apparently the very voters the weird Tory infatuation with hard left environmental policies were meant to entice.
Indeed, a whole set of Tory policies designed to raise energy prices, have gone down like a lead balloon.
What voters want and politicians need to deliver
You do wonder if they will ever get round to realising voters really want just three things, a roof over their heads, bread on the table and a job. Deliver those and do so competently, and politics is easy.
The roof bit is a shambles; it turns out policies designed to enrich cabinet members and senior civil servants with buy to let portfolios, are not so good for anyone else. I suspect the job bit will soon turn turtle, and the bread bit is going off the rails too. See graph below:
Here is a link to the relevant page on Statista
We notice that the big Western democracies still seem hell bent on raising energy prices, which is universally unpopular.
UK local elections - a brief look at opposition policies
So, the other thing markets in the UK (and sterling) will be doing is wonder about Starmer policies, more critically does he have the âbottomâ to either appoint radical reformers, or have them lined up in key seats? Letâs say he does. He will still continue the headlong wealth destruction of punitive taxation and the assault on business investment. He will over-regulate (thatâs his background). The sole variable therefore feels like any plausible capacity to reform.
He is not afraid of hard choices, or of thinking long, both good points and incidentally he is not Blairite enough to be Americaâs poodle and get involved in picking pointless foreign wars. Although he will likely dismember the United Kingdom, either of political necessity or by accident. We really canât see much support for sterling in that package.
Central Banks - are they signalling a hard landing?
Inflation is spiking into double figures, and Central Banks are explaining
1) it is really not their fault
2) they are only responsible for âcore inflationâ (so without the important stuff)
3) but anyway they must still raise rates to offset the malign effects of other state policies.
It is looking truly absurd.
Not that interest rates are off the floor yet, although the US bond market seems convinced rates over 3% are now nailed on, while oddly the UK Gilt-edged market seems unconvinced of exactly the same thing. This of course is helping an on-going collapse in Sterling.
Meanwhile the possibility of ending negative rates in Europe has caused great excitement and the Euro to strengthen, at least against sterling. The divergence is related to a belief that the Fed which raised three months after the Bank of England is now more hawkish, a belief which seems more about wishful thinking than anything the Fed has actually done so far.
We are less sure on how high interest rates go. All three Central Banks seem to be hoping something will turn up, and inflation will ease. This is a view we share, but we really doubt the trivial rate rises so far, are the âsomethingâ.
Market turmoil - how far will they fall?
This leads on to the current market turmoil: With the US feeling very exposed, partly because it went up so high (relative to other markets), it has further to fall. Nor do we see the valuations on quoted US growth stocks as offering good value at these levels. They had become so detached from reality the gap is just too big, and the repeated attempts to buy the dips, just disguises a long-term trend down. The FTSE100 over five years is down, and the NASDAQ climbed over 100% in the same time. A 25% further US fall is at the least plausible.
Other markets will then get sucked down, and in Europe and Japan they are hard hit by their reliance on imported energy (the US is an energy exporter). While for now, their rates are not moving either, the resulting devaluation makes the value gap to US growth stocks, feel even greater. Buying overvalued stock in an overvalued currency, is not always great.
What do our models say about the markets?
Our MonograM momentum models suggest a turning point for both Europe (including within that bundle the UK) and Japan is close. It is only a model, we remind ourselves, and is quite able to give a false signal. It also sees this as true in dollar terms, not sterling. So, there is plenty of noise and last week had all the elements we dislike, a month end, plus a shortened market week, plus Central Bank meetings, created a baffling miasma of signals.
However, on current policies we anticipate a crash; the only issue now is how hard the landing is.
REINSTATING REAL ECONOMICS - WISH YOU WERE HERE?
A return to the real world, where money has a time value is a great achievement. Inflation is after all transitory. At long last the most important of all price signals (interest rates) can break free, allowing for growth to resume. That is a cause for optimism.
Letâs look at the basics and start with food and fuel. Cereals are a critical foodstuff; we should remember they are almost automatically in surplus. All the great famines in history have been caused by logistical and storage failures, not an absence of global grain. Nor is energy a problem; our self-imposed constraints on its use are. Those are political, not physical.
Cold Comfort for Change - inflation, voters and price trends
Inflation, as we all keep hearing, is a supply side issue, which if true will always get sorted by either demand destruction, substitution, or new supply. But sorted it will be. The good thing about energy and food is that they are universally available, we favour one source or another because of price, convenience, fashion or dogma.
So, at some point they stabilise, it all depends on where the greater political heat is from; currently most Western governments fear lost âgreenâ votes more than high prices. Or indeed they may be simply locked into the Orwellian power surge of a foreign villain to fight, using young menâs lives.
However, history says that at some point jam tomorrow is less attractive to voters, than simply living today. We are not there yet. But either prices will ease, or we will ultimately take a pragmatic route and use our abundant low-cost resources.
These problems are not like microchips, with genuine supply issues; the extra chips simply donât exist; extra food and energy supplies do.
For grain there are vast swathes of the planet where it could be grown and is not, from the field margin just over my hedge, to parts of every other continent, outside the polar regions. The rest of the neighbouring field has spring wheat, an early sign of switching (a winter wheat crop would have to have been pre-planted). Yields may not be great, machines may not be efficient, but thatâs what price discovery does, if the cheapest producer drops out, the marginal one steps in.
In global terms lost planting land in Ukraine is trivial. And every year land is left fallow due to warfare or natural disaster, thatâs why markets exist. As for Russian surpluses, they will simply get stored or eaten in the half of the globe, that does not think as we do.
So, prices will sort themselves out.
Blue Skies from Pain - insurance and government borrowing
To reiterate, the big win is the defeat of the zero or negative interest rate world. The effect of that is quite tangible, in some cases: we wonât have insurance companies forced into a negative discounting of their liabilities anymore, nor will every defined benefit buyout be able to pretend there is no time value for money, releasing a fatal burden on pension schemes. Discounting will be back.
Time once more exists.
But the greater victory is against Government debt, the intergenerational horror of saying we can incur infinite debt for our children to pay down, because look, it is free! No more. Once more jam today means dry toast tomorrow.
Capitalism cannot work without price disclosure, and without prices, populism can roam free to destroy everything. At last, it is back in chains again, much as it yearns to fracture them.
The political price maybe high; I doubt if both Lagarde and Powell can keep their jobs. They still grandly support ever greater restraints on supply, almost as foolishly as they say they still believe interest rates wonât rise that much. An amusing deceit.
A Cold Steel Rail
Ploughing through the accounts of Glencore, one of the big resource outfits, I realise just how much of their recent good fortune (and it is spectacular) is tied to Governments forcing producing assets off the market and reducing the operational efficiency of installed plant. Demand is up, but supply (so the tonnages mined) is down. The production restrictions are state imposed, but there is little desire to invest anew, while they exist. Indeed, the CEO earns a bonus both for high profits and also for low capital expenditure: a strange way round. A critical supplier for the energy transition, that wants to be smaller, a fine tribute to governmental mishandling of our world.
For all that we still donât expect Powell to be that aggressive on rate rises; all along he has talked tough but acted soft, it is his comprehension of what âgoodâ market communication means. Many of us have another word for it.
So, we do see rates as having risen too far, too fast, and they now need to stabilise, Powellâs talk and the market need to get back in line. Although the collapse of the Japanese Yen reminds us where the void lies too. And that a host of market decisions all really just come back to your faith in the US Dollar. While sterling has juddered lower at the whisper of cowardice by the Old Lady, but she has talked mild, acted fierce, the right way round, and I expect the UK to keep raising rates.
A Walk on Part in the War
While the UK political scene hots up, two factions in the Tory party are tussling for power, the populists and the realists. Both incidentally dislike Boris as a sell-out and will speak ill of him to the media.
The populists have done very well, loading on taxes and regulations and fluffy aspirations. And they have chanted fiercely in favour of pouring arms into a foreign war, simply because it is what gets approvals on Twitter. As if that ever ends well. Their new-found blood lust is extraordinary. So too is their fierce advocacy of fighting inflation with hand-outs, which is so 1960âs and known to be altogether futile.
The realists meanwhile seem to know that is the path to doom, but lack the nerve or confidence to say so outright. To eject Boris therefore requires two swarms of slightly crazed insects to coalesce, and in a mutual fury sting him fatally, then try not to destroy each other in a fight for the spoils. Are Tory MPs that stupid, mindless or incensed? Interesting question. I suspect like Powell they seek advantage in talking tough, knowing they canât act.
While aware I may already be wrong as I write this, I feel compelled to say that I wouldnât expect Macron, a realist, to fall before Le Pen a populist, but you never know.
So, I do feel we are, after a long wait, where we should have been after the GFC; if so thatâs a great win for rational investing. It is odd, that one crisis (COVID) is treated with monetary excess, while another (Ukraine) with monetary tightening; to an economist the problems (supply destruction) feel quite similar, the responses feel oddly confused.
But as Churchill noted America usually gets it right, albeit after exhausting all other options.
Perhaps it now has?
Will the March lows now be re-tested?
In dollar terms that looks likely, but sterling investors remain well clear of that point. I suspect (for now) uncertainty is doing the real damage and making it too easy simply to stand aside. But a belief that yields are high enough would draw funds into US bonds (clearly is already) Â and by definition, the currency. This oddly will then help US equities to find their feet.
That combination of forces, for now, has meant un-hedged S&P 500 has been a clear (and stunningly simple) winner in our flagship MonograM sterling strategy.
The modelâs skill is in making that prediction, so that we were already correctly positioned, going into the year.
Were you?
Our performance newsletters give comprehensive details of our portfolio month by month.